There are those who spend their energy on being part of the problem and not the solution, such as denying the impact of our increasing emissions of carbon dioxide equivalents on the global warming. Some say, such as some old male professors from KTH, that there are those who gain too much on a renewable revolution that the effect of our human impact and all is made up and should not be used for shaming… rather boring and not modern opinions and not at all acting towards the solution. However, on those people’s level; have that not been the case for fossil resources a long time? Has it not been very feasible for just a few people on earth to harvest fossil resources and own the whole fuel, material and energy distribution? And is that not a very feasible reason for being a “denier”?
Make solutions not arguing for things that put you as part of the problem…